By Arjun Walia | Collective Evolution
- The Facts:A new coronavirus vaccine is being rushed to the market. Human trails are beginning in multiple countries, and in the United States it might be ready before the end of the year.
- Reflect On:Why has vaccine hesitancy seemed to have increased every single year. Is it because people are becoming more educated and aware? Do our federal health regulatory have our best interests in mind, or is something else going on here?
Ever since Bill Gates, politicians like Justin Trudeau, and many others said ‘that things won’t go back to being completely normal until we have a coronavirus vaccine that’s reached billions of people, it seems that many people are concerned that the new coronavirus vaccine might be mandatory. But will it?
After Gates made his comments about the vaccine, his instagram comments were full of thousands of comments from people who clearly will not take the vaccine.
In Canada, where Collective Evolution is based, a recent poll conducted by Leger and the Association for Canadian Studies found that 60% of those who participated in the poll believe people should be required to get the vaccine once it is ready, the other 40% think it should be voluntary. If you extrapolate that, nearly half of the people in Canada would not support a mandatory coronavirus vaccine. That’s a lot of people.
In the United Kingdom, the BBC recently made it quite clear that regulations cannot require a person to undertake medical treatment, including vaccination. The Coronavirus Act introduced in March 2020 extended this prohibition to Scotland and Northern Ireland, and it’s no different, this legislation “makes explicitly clear that the power to make such regulations does not include mandatory treatment or vaccination.”
So, it’s looking like the new coronavirus vaccine will not be mandatory. But…
Vaccine Hesitancy Increasing
It’s no secret that vaccine hesitancy seems to be increasing every single year. This point was emphasized at the World Health Organization’s recent Global Vaccine Safety Summit. Professor Heidi Larson, a Professor of Anthropology and the Risk and Decision Scientist Director at the Vaccine Confidence Project stated:
The other thing that’s a trend, and an issue, is not just confidence in providers but confidence of health care providers, we have a very wobbly health professional frontline that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. That’s a huge problem, because to this day any study I’ve seen… still, the most trusted person on any study I’ve seen globally is the health care provider, and if we lose that, we’re in trouble.
This would make it very hard to implement a mandatory vaccine. It’s quite clear that if the vaccine was made to be mandatory, it would cause quite a backlash. Mandatory childhood vaccines that are required for children to go to school have already been causing mass protests across the United States. Even if the coronavirus vaccine was made to be mandatory, there would be a large portion of the population who would refuse it.
Although it seems that the vaccine won’t be mandatory, the fear and hysteria created around the new coronavirus, as well as a potential second wave later in the fall/next winter will be a perfect way for big pharma to market the vaccine, as they are already doing so now. But just because it won’t be completely mandatory, it might be required, like other vaccines, for children to go to school. It may even be required for people to travel abroad, or return to work. Hopefully that’s not the case.
President Donald Trump recently shared his belief that a vaccine might not even be necessary for COVID-19 to pass. Obviously, this kind of belief goes completely against people like Bill Gates as well as federal health regulatory agencies around the world as well as the World Health Organization. It is important to note that many of those pushing for the vaccine have interests in this narrative.
As far as vaccine development, a coronavirus vaccine developed by a Chinese research team is currently in human trials in China. Researchers hope to soon test it in Canada, too, according to a press release from the National Research Council of Canada.
Philanthropist and former tech executive Meldina Gates, said that scientists and health officials may find a vaccine that is effective in preventing Covid-19 by the end of this year “if we’re lucky.”
Another factor that also seems to be causing some concern is the idea that the vaccine is the only solution, and that nothing else, at all, has any potential to work against this new coronavirus.
What we are seeing from the mainstream right now is the ridicule of other therapies that have shown success. For example, Medicine in Drug Discovery, of Elsevier, a major scientific publishing house, recently published an article on early and high-dose IVC in the treatment and prevention of Covid-19. The article was written by Dr. Richard Cheng, MD, PhD, a US board-certified anti-aging specialist from Shanghai, China.
Dr. Cheng has been updating everyone via his YouTube channel about vitamin C treatment cases out of China for quite some time now. he principle investigator for “Vitamin C Infusion for the Treatment of Severe 2019-nCoV Infected Pneumonia” (ClinicalTrials.gov), which is a clinical trial underway in China using intravenous Vitamin C to treat COVID-19, ZhiYong Peng, who is also a professor and the Chief of Critical Care Medicine at Zhongnan Hospital, in Wuhan, China, recently hoped on Youtube with Dr. Cheng to provide more updates. You can read more about that here.
Hydroxychloroquine is another example of a potentially useful treatment tat is getting flack from MSM.
The point is, these therapies are made out to be controversial, and all it takes is mainstream media casting doubt for the public ad some health officials to take this position. They have the ability to control the perception of the masses with regards to major global events if people don’t get information from multiple sources. They can easily taint and “de-bunk” something that’s backed by credible sources and evidence in order to push a certain agenda. In this case, it seems to be a vaccine.
When it comes to topics like vaccines, it’s important to ask ourselves if public health is the main priority in the eyes of regulatory agencies. It can be challenging, and even scary for some people, to take on the thought that it might not be. There are multiple examples that make it quite clear as to why more and more people are not trusting our federal health regulatory agencies, like the Spider Papers.
We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception. Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors. Others see it and turn the other way. Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right. We have representatives from across the agency that witness this unacceptable behavior. It occurs at all levels and in all of our respective units. These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health. (source)
Do we always have to listen to what government health agencies tell us about our health? Should we constantly rely on them to tell us what is and what isn’t, or should we rely on ourselves? Why are platforms like YouTube deleting coronavirus content that contradicts the World Health Organization? Why is there a digital authoritarian Orwellian fact-checker going around telling people what is instead of letting them examine information, sources and evidence and deciding for themselves?